 |
| Click on the image to start the Video |
I recently rented the Olympus 14-35 f2.0 lens from
Lens Lenders in Canada for an entire month. I wanted to talk about the experience of both renting a lens and of using that Zuiko lens. Most of the information can be found in the short video above (sorry about the focusing issues, I've finally clued into the idea that I should turn off the continuous autofocus) but I wanted to share images as well in this post that I took over the month.
For those of you that have considered renting a lens in the past but weren't sure if it was a good use of your money I'll just say this. If there is a lens out there that is rather expensive and you are unsure if you would like it or can afford to buy it or get much use out of it, then financially renting can be a very wise choice. If you are a working photographer then the cost of the rental is a write off for you on your taxes. I will say that you should ensure you have insurance for that lens in case something goes wrong while you have it. For me that was covered by the insurance I carry through the PPOC (Professional Photographers of Canada) but you may be able to insure your equipment and rentals through your homeowners insurance if you are an amateur photographer. I have rented from Lens Lenders in Canada three times now and found it to be a really good experience, one that I would highly recommend. It just couldn't be easier to get the lens you need when you need it delivered right to your door.
 |
| 1/2500th of a second ISO 400 f2.0 |
Now, for the lens. I've used it before several months ago (last September) for a week and really enjoyed it. The snapshot above of my daughter and the Bride below were created then. You can find my initial review of the lens
here that will have some detail on it that I won't cover again.
 |
| 1/500th of a second at ISO 100 and f8.0 |
Just quickly, and for those of you that don't know, I also own the Canon 24-70 f2.8 lens that I use on a 5D mk II. It is a superb lens, but ever since I bought some more primes for the Canon, one I don't use very often. The Canon lens shows some distortion and vignetting, but is very good even wide open. The Olympus Lens is tack sharp wide open and shows next to zero distortion. You can still get some stretching when you shoot at 14mm (or anywhere wider than the 35mm) with it, something I really noticed in the arms of models on occasion (see below, though I corrected it some) but it was for the most part a worry free experience in a package that is f2.0 throughout the zoom range and is about the same size and weight as the Canon lens.
 |
| 1/100 of a second ISO 100 f6.3 |
What I'm most impressed with the Olympus lens is that despite having the Leica 25mm f1.4 in my bag, I never pulled it out. The zoom lens was really that nice to use. It focuses fast, is a nice size and balances well on the Olympus E3. I regret somewhat that most of my use came in studio and very little wide open. In fact I think the only wide open shot I took was one of myself (actually Adam took it). I only know how well it works wide open because when I first rented it last year I pretty much set it at f2.0 right out of the box and started playing.
 |
| 1/125th of second at ISO 800 and f2.0 |
Having that lens for a month had me using the E3 a lot for the month of February. In fact my Canon started to collect dust. I love the E3 but I will say that I sometimes missed the lack of detail in the 5D mk II. I was beginning to wonder how well that E5 would work. Then again, sometimes lack of detail in a portrait can be a good thing. It's a double edged sword and I will also say that the RAW files of the Olympus' 10 megapixel sensor are handled easily by my iMac and Macbook Pro, while the 5D files can at times really clog things up. That, my friends really helps with workflow. You get through editing much faster when you're not waiting for the spinning beach ball.
 |
| 1/250 of a second ISO 100 f8.0 |
All this use of the lens though left me wanting more. When it came time to pack it up and return it to Lens Lenders I was a little sad. In fact there are 4 lenses that I really want to own from Oympus. The 7-14 f4.0, the 14-35 f2.0, the 35-100 f2.0 and the 150mm f2.0. Lens rentals are a good thing for me though as I use Canon for my job (for the most part) so investments in other equipment don't always make sense. And that was on my mind while I used the Zuiko. Is it worth it for photographers to buy these lenses at all?
 |
| 1/250 of a second ISO 200 f2.2 using in camera off camera flash control and Olympus FL50R |
The Olympus E5 has not exactly extinguished fears among Olympus users that the four thirds DSLR's are a dying or dead breed. Olympus itself has pretty much
announced that mirrorless is the way of the future for them and they are not a company that has been loyal to a format in the past after dumping OM and the original PEN series. So with all that in mind is it really responsible to spend between $1400 and $2600 for one of those dream lenses of mine when the format to use them on is already on its last camera, the E5. And, given that the E5 (while a wonderful camera) is newly on the market but higher priced and lower performing than it's direct competitors from Pentax, Canon and Nikon this isn't a winning game for us Olympus loyalists.
 |
| 1/100 of a second ISO 100 f7.1 |
 |
| 1/250 of a second ISO 100 at f4.0 |
The truth is that a good photographer can make good images from an Olympus E1 and these legendary Zuiko lenses. The Olympus lenses have pretty much carried the brand since the introduction of four thirds and their reputation is well deserved. A photographer buying an E5 now can very realistically get a decade of use out of it so if you are already invested in four thirds lenses then it makes a certain amount of sense to carry on. For myself, as someone making a living selling images, my purchases have to make sense in the grand scheme of return on investment, and this is where I suspect Olympus has finally put the nail in their coffin of offering professional products to people earning a living with their camera.
 |
| 1/250 of a second ISO 100 f3.2 |
 |
| 1/250 of a second ISO 100 f6.3 |
The Olympus 14-35 f2.0 Zuiko SWD lens is wonderful. I miss it already and I'm going to confess that I'm still not leaving the brand behind despite my personal certainty of where it is going. I enjoy using the E3 very much, in fact I admit that I enjoy it more than the 5D mk II even though I recognize the superiority of the Canon equipment on many levels. I know that at some point I will probably pick up the 7-14 and 150mm lenses if I can find them for a bargain and the E5 as well. For me they have become niche use equipment. I'm happy to use the Olympus when I don't need high ISO or large amounts of file detail. In fact, I prefer it.
 |
| 1/80 of a second ISO 100 f9.0 |
 |
| 1/80 of a second ISO 100 f9.0 |
So do I recommend you buy the lens? Yes and no. Look, if you are a photographer for fun and you currently use Olympus gear, then yes you should absolutely run to your camera store and purchase this lens. It is as good as it gets. I like it as much as the Leica 25mm f1.4 and better than the Canon 24-70 f2.8. It is the right size (balances well), is tack sharp, focus is snappy and accurate and it is absolutely getting the best possible file out of your camera. In fact I would say that my E3 is not up to giving all this lens can take, maybe the E5 would be a better match. If photography is your passion and your fun, then why not have the best from your gear? If however you are making a living from photography you have a tough choice, and one that I share. Personally I spend all my coin nowadays on Canon equipment, but at some point I'm sure I'll have enough work tools and my mind (and bank account) will wander back to where I want it to be. In the meantime, if you can't decide, go ahead and rent it from Lens Lenders and see for yourself.
 |
| 1/160 second ISO 100 f5.0 |
 |
| 1/250 of a second ISO 100 f5.6 |
All of the images in this post were created with the Olympus E3 and 14-35 f2.0 lens. Thanks for reading my blog, I very much appreciate it. Comments are always welcome of course. I also just want to say that while I know this blog isn't about international issues or events, the catastrophic news out of Japan right now is horrible and I'm definitely worried about the news of earthquake, tsunami and nuclear issues. All of these Japanese
camera companies that I love to blog about have
employees and families there in Japan and my heart goes out to them and their country. The issue of which lens is better, which camera has better ISO performance and what photo is prettier just doesn't seem important in light of such a horrible week for Japan.
 |
| 1/80 of a second ISO 100 at f11 |